The model sat out, and this is what it cost

Newest published call 2026-10-18 · derived from the graded close of 2026-10-17 · page generated 2026-10-19.

Since 2026-07-11 the published call has spent 37 of 68 days in Wait in Stables. Over that stretch Bitcoin went $64,119 to $84,392. This page is the accounting for that.

That call is no longer the one being published. What it cost while it stood is measured below, unedited.

Published call

HOLD BTC

Held since

2026-09-29

17 published rows, 20 calendar days

BTC

$81,269

−34.9% from the high

Composite score

−0.020

signal: Hold

What sitting out cost

+22.1%

That is the Bitcoin move the model was not holding for. Compounding every day-to-day step from 2026-07-11 to 2026-09-28 on which the published call was Wait in Stables, Bitcoin moved +22.1%. It is forgone upside, in full, and nothing in this window offsets it — the steps in question were net up, not net down. The ledger is missing 15 days (2026-07-13, 2026-07-15, 2026-08-30, 2026-08-31, 2026-09-01, 2026-09-02, 2026-09-05, 2026-09-08, 2026-09-15, 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18, 2026-10-10, 2026-10-11, 2026-10-12), so a couple of those steps span two days rather than one.

Across that whole span the price went $64,119 to $84,392, +31.6% in 79 days. 37 of the 68 published calls in it were Wait in Stables; on the remainder the model was invested, and those steps came to +7.8%.

Read as an all-in / all-out rule — fully invested on every call that is not Wait in Stables, fully out on every call that is — following this ledger from 2026-07-10 would have returned +6.3% against +28.6% for doing nothing at all. That reading is deliberately crude: the invested phases are dollar-cost-averaging instructions rather than a switch, so take it as the shape of the gap and not as a portfolio result. The gap is real either way.

This call is no longer being published

As of 2026-10-18 the published call is HOLD BTC, held since 2026-09-29. The accounting above is measured over the window in which the model was actually sitting out, 2026-07-11 to 2026-09-28, and it stops where that stopped — it is not quietly re-pointed at whatever the model is doing now. What happened next is on the ledger, row by row.

This position may simply be wrong

It may be wrong right now. Nothing above argues that the call is correct. It argues that it is deliberate, that its exit condition was stated in advance, and that its cost is on this page rather than buried. If Bitcoin keeps running from here, the model will have missed a leg of a bull market, and no amount of well-behaved machinery makes that a good outcome for anyone who followed it.
The live record is far too short to judge it on. It begins 2026-07-10. A record that short says nothing about a four-year cycle, and this page is not evidence that the model works. It is one call, in progress, with the meter running.
The backtest is a different thing and we will not blend the two. The measured result the site leads with is a drawdown one: over the current cycle the modelled portfolio's worst peak-to-trough fall is −26.9% against −53.1% for holding, on a dollar return of 2.03× that cycle. Those come from a backtest over history, not from this ledger, and neither is a forecast. Figures as recorded in the metrics register on 2026-10-16.
Every call is published, including the bad ones. The full record — the whipsaw fortnight, the days the logger failed, and the rows produced by a version of the code we no longer stand behind — is on the call ledger, hash-chained and never edited. If this call ages badly, it will age badly in public.

Fraktalicious Research · Privacy · Call ledger · Daily briefing
Nothing on this site is financial advice. This page describes what a model is saying and what saying it has cost. It is not a recommendation, and not a claim that the model is right.