The famous top signal, deliberately given a small vote
On 2026-08-25 the Fraktalicious cycle model scored Pi Cycle at 0.000 — neutral — and gave it an effective weight of 0.012. That is a contribution of 0.0000 to the day's raw composite of −0.0060, the 12th-largest of the 15 signals carrying weight today.
Pi Cycle compares two moving averages of daily closes: the 111-day average, and twice the 350-day average. The indicator “fires” when the fast line crosses up through the slow one, and its reputation comes from having done so within a few days of the 2013, 2017 and 2021 cycle peaks.
The quantity this page tracks is the distance between those two lines as a percentage. Negative means the 111-day average is still below twice the 350-day one; zero is the cross.
The model gives Pi Cycle a deliberately small vote. Its weight was cut from 0.12 to 0.04 as “massively overweighted”, and a hard override built on top of it was removed at the same time — the code's own comment calls that gate “a bandaid for the overweighting”. In a bear market the weight is cut to three tenths of that again, and in accumulation to a fifth.
In the graded model it is effectively one-sided. A cross scores −0.95; as the lines converge the score walks up through −0.7 and −0.4 toward zero. The most positive value it can ever produce is +0.1.
The most important tier is the one that scores exactly zero: a wide gap between the two averages. An earlier version scored a wide gap as bullish, and in 2021 Pi Cycle sat more than 40% away from its cross and pushed the composite up through a double top. Distance from a top indicator is not evidence of safety, and this model now says nothing rather than saying something reassuring.
Every figure in this table is measured over the model's full graded replay — 5,051 days from 2012-10-27 to 2026-08-25 — and re-measured on every daily refresh.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Score today | 0.000 |
| Percentile of that score in its own history | 11.3% |
| Most constructive reading on record | +0.100 · 2013-10-06 |
| Most cautionary reading on record | −0.950 · 2013-12-05 |
| Days it carried weight | 4,707 of 5,051 |
| Share of those days its score changed | 0.7% |
| Mean effective weight, over the days it was active | 0.0297 |
| Share of all weight the model assigned, averaged over every day | 4.9% |